Document Type
Report
Publication Date
9-24-2025
Abstract
Objectives: This study tests whether and how the Canadian public health workforce differed from the Canadian general population in their political attitudes, worldviews and policy preferences related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Nearly identical surveys were fielded to the Canadian public health workforce in 2021 through leading public health associations and to a census-balanced sample of the general Canadian population in February and March 2021. through a consumer quota sample for a survey of the general population.
Results: The Canadian public health workforce demonstrates systematically more left-wing pro-egalitarian, anti-hierarchical, anti-individualist worldviews. Those in health promotion positions are slightly more to the left than those in non-health promotion positions. However, the public health sample did not uniformly favour stricter COVID-19 containment and prevention policies than the general population. When modelling COVID-19 prevention policies as a function of cultural worldviews and ideology, it appeared that these had a greater effect on policy preferences in the general population than in the public health sample.
Conclusion: The public health workforce is more left-wing than the general population and professionals in health promotion positions are more left-wing than others in public health. But the public health workforce did not uniformly prefer stricter COVID-19 prevention policies. Cultural worldviews and ideology were stronger predictors of policy preferences for the general population than for the public health sample respondents.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
KIss, S., Fafard P., Perrella, A., Shankardass, K. Lachapelle, E., Arp M., and Trowbridge, J. (2025). Comparing Ideology and COVID-19 Preferences of Canadian Public Health Workers and the General Population. Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy. https://doi.org/10.51644/HYEO2285